At the papal performs ingredientral throng in August 2003, the twain houses of the perform building building government, the kinsperson of Bishops and the House of Deputies, made a passing controversial conclusion that has threatened to split the church service in half. They voted to elect gene Robinson, an openly gay spell, as bishop of the episcopate of New Hampshire. I do not deliberate that this was the remunerate finis for some(prenominal) reasons. Gene Robinson divorced his wife and travel in with another public thirteen years ago. Since that time, he has been supporting in a sexual relationship with that man outdoor(a) the bounds of marriage. If he had been active in the same gonzo of relationship with a woman, on that point is no way he would have been elected. I do not think that the church should compromise its beliefs and principles to satisfy a minority group. I have no problem with Gene Robinson world a member of the pontifical church; however, I do not consider that it is bestow into account for him to be in a leadership panorama in the church. The bishop of a diocese in the pontifical Church is a very strategic office. A bishop is responsible for either of the priests and churches in the diocese, and while more people say that Gene Robinson is qualified for the position, his lifestyle goes against the teachings of the Bible.
I do not believe that he should be the phantasmal leader of this group of people. The doctrines of the Episcopal Church say that the church stands on three pillars, scripture, reason, and tradition. In my opinion, the pick of Gene Robinson goes against either three, and therefore against everything the church stands for. I cannot deduce how the leaders of the church could make a decision that they knew would shatter... If you take to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper