Monday, May 27, 2019
Hate Crime :: essays research papers
On October tenth of 2004, eleven Christians were arrested for street witnessing on a public sidewalk during a gay pride event. Charges were dropped against six of them, but four adults and one juvenile faced serious charges under Philadelphias hate crime laws. These five people were charged with criminal conspiracy, ethnic intimidation, reckless endangerment, and inciting a riot. Each person, if convicted, faced 47 years in prison and a $90,000 fine. The state of Pennsylvania tardily added ethnic intimidation to its hate crime law on December 5, 2002. Under this section preaching for the Bible is now considered hate speech and is wicked in a public forum. Philadelphia prosecutor Charles Ehrlich attacked the protesters as hateful and claimed that preaching from the Bible about homosexuality is considered fighting words that can be verboten from the public square as an incitement to a riot.In title 18 of the first amendment, it is clearly proven that these Christians did break the law. I do twin with what they were preaching. It is unfortunate that Christians are now being arrested for sharing the gospel in public. The bible clearly states that as Christians, we are supposed to share the good news. In the book of Mathew, chapter nine, verse thirty-five says,Jesus went through all the towns and villages, teaching in their synagogues, preaching the good news of the kingdom and healing every unhealthiness and sickness.As Christians, we are supposed to be like Jesus in every aspect of our lives, and these five Christians were doing what they were called to do. However, by doing this, they were breaking the law and in doing so, they requisite to be held accountable. OFFENSE DEFINED.--A PERSON COMMITS THE OFFENSE OF ETHNIC INTIMIDATION IF, WITH MALICIOUS INTENTION TOWARD THE ACTUAL OR PERCEIVED RACE, COLOR, RELIGION OR, NATIONAL ORIGIN, ANCESTRY, MENTAL OR PHYSICAL DISABILITY, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, GENDER OR GENDER IDENTITY OF AN other(a) INDIVIDUAL OR GROUP OF I NDIVIDUALS, HE COMMITS AN OFFENSE UNDER ANY OTHER PROVISION OF THIS ARTICLE.