12 wroth Men
Grand Canyon University
Introduction: In the movie 12 Angry Men an eighteen year old boy is charged with the murder of his father. At first, all of the twelve jurors believe that he is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, except for one, who believes that they owe the boy more than five minutes in deciding if he lives or not. The man who does not believe that the boy is guilty explains his views to the rest of the jurors and is ridiculed by them. An old man afterward sees where he is going with his reasoning and when the next vote is done, he also votes innocent. The jurors continue to discuss the case and bring up some important facts in favor of the teenager. Gradually, other jurors sire to change their minds, and the ones that do not become outraged. This paper germinate out analyze this movie in terms of how this group worked in concert and the end making process, which emerged by answering nine pick out questions.
juror 1 was a coach and knew the true meaning of working together and in an orderly fashion.
Juror 2 was a flocculent spoken follower who could be swayed by the crowd.
Juror 3 stood his ground with the guilty verdict until the end because of the tear relationship with his own son.
The fact that Juror 4 wore eyeglasses made him reconsider the womans testimony of perceive the boy stab his father as she was turning everyplace in bed. He knew people who wear eyeglasses do not wear them to bed.
Juror 5 was minor mannered and kept his cool and was receptive to the others thoughts and opinions and lessons they taught him.
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper