Evaluation on Durkheims theory- Deviance
Durkheim was a racealist who believed that societies be held in concert via shared values and economic independence. He believed that there was a possibility of the collapse in society if the values are non constantly affirmed and sent from one generation to a nonher. consequently he says the maintenance of values is a crucial function of society. There are a few ways to reaffirm these values and ensure social cohesion: Education and religion.
Durkheim argued that curse was inevitable for society to run smoothly and should be a normal aspect of life. He says that there should be a limited amount of disgust so that society result be able to differentiate amidst what is cover and what is wrong. Durkheim imagined a society of saints and said that if everyone was perfect there will til now be deviation, but the slightest slip will be regarded as a serious offence e.g. picking your nose in public.
According to Durkheim there are 2 key elements to catch crime.
He says that crime is necessary and beneficial to society, and that society could not exist without deviance, however he says as well as much crime will be bad for society and could cause a collapse. Crime is functional however will come nonadaptive if crime rate is too low or too high. He says that for change to occur a yesterday deviance must become todays normality so all in all deviance in the right proportion is healthy. Collective sentiments us be different end-to-end a society or else there will be no changes or very little deviance.
Durkheim has criticisms, he does not explain why certain people are more(prenominal) likely to commit crimes and was not interested In solvent the problem but seeing their nature of the relationship between deviance and order In society.If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper