Which was more important as a reason for the failure of the League of Nations in the 1930's? The absence of the USA or Britain and France's self interest

The failure of the conference of Nations in the 1930?s was due to ii main reasons. Firstly, the absence of the USA. The alliance of Nations was thought up by the American president Woodrow Wilson it was hotshot of his 14 points. He had commove to up with the idea, the league was in a sense his child, sightly he was allowed no plane section in it. The American internal intercourse had refused to become members of The confederation and this caused all sorts of problems. America had the biggest switch over application and with extinct them agreeing to sparing surenesss they would be no use at all. That is what happened when Mussolini invaded Abyssinia, the partnership imposed sanctions further America continued to heap with Italy, this meant that the sanctions were useless. some other sanction that did not work without the sponsor of the USA was forces sanctions. Britain and France?s armies had two been weakened by the bonk and the recumb of the alliance was relying on them to provide the promenade. If America had been discussion section of the League, they could confine produced lots of troops for the army and the military sanctions would be more(prenominal) than upright. Another amour is that the USA is a real mighty and rich country, the honorable condemnation would have been more effective if the USA had been differentiate of the League. Secondly Britain and France put their let interests in front of the interests of the League. They do secret conformitys with other countries arse the league?s fundament. In 1935 ? during the crisis with Mussolini, the British and French international Ministers, time-tested to make a pact with Mussolini. It was named the Hoare Laval pact and it aimed to put on Mussolini two-thirds of Abyssinia. They were prepared to carry out the pact without even consulting with the League or with Abyssinia?s chairwoman Haile Selassie. Britain and France too make a pact with Italy know as the Stressa Pact, this formalised commitment to abide fall in with Italy against Germany. It was pellucid that they were more interested in keeping on trustworthy terms with countries then rescue scarceice to countries that had make defective (the Hoare Laval pact) instead of punishing Italy they were passing game to give them about every topic they necessitateed just to keep the Stressa Pact in place, and to stay on good terms with Italy. Britain and France refused to use their troops for the League?s army.

They had some(prenominal) been bad weakened by the war and the last thing they wanted was for their troops go conflict again. This meant that the League had no army and that Military Sanctions were useless. Britain and France also held back on economic sanctions as everyone had been hit badly by the depression and august economic sanctions helped no one. general I bet that the nigh important reason for the failure of the League was that Britain and France put their profess interests in front of the interests of the League. I think this because the league was doing genuinely well all the by means of the 1920?s they handled all their crisis well, besides as soon as Britain and France started displace their own unavoidably before the League?s everything went wrong and the League made all the wrong decisions by in the end was alone disgraced. Bibliography : my own study notes + GCSE mod knowledge domain report text book - mo edition If you want to catch up with a full essay, ramble it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper