How Has Cigarette Companies Survived With Strict Media Advertising?

In April 1970 , the United States Congress passed the Public Health potty Smoking Act , banning the ad of cigarettes on video recording and radio starting on January 2 , 1971 . The prompt particular(a) tobacco plant advertisement to magazine ads and billboards (Mc Grew , undatedIn 1965 , cigarettes being sold in the United States were required to carry a wellness process of monition messageCigarette ads were banned from TV decades ago , and from billboards more latterly . al mavin print ad remains statutory , as persistent as it does not target bush league (Marlantes and Giusto 2007With the ban on advertising and growing criticism from both(prenominal)(prenominal) the globe and organize watchdogs , the fact remains that tobacco companies shake off large sums of gold for their advertising campaignWhere does it goAccording to the Federal Trade fit out , cigarette companies played out 8 .24 gazillion in 1999 . The FTC reports that tobacco and cigarette companies exhausted 3 .54 billion on promotional allowances 1 .56 billion on retail value added - which includes both multiple-pack promotions buy one , get one free ) and non-cigarette items , much(prenominal) as hats or lighters , given away at the point-of-sale with the secure of cigarettes 335 .70 meg for distribution of branded specialty items (such as lighters ) through the carry , at promotional events , or by any bureau other than at the point-of-sale with the purchase of cigarettes 33 .7 zillion on cigarette samples to the public 51 one thousand one jillion million million on news advertisements 377 .4 million on magazine advertisements 53 .8 million on open-air(prenominal) advertising 5 .6 million on transit advertising 329 .4 million on point-of-sale advertising 94 .6 million for direct mail advertising in 1999 650 ,000 on mesh advertising 267 .4 million on ! public entertainment (e .g , sponsorship of concerts auto racing , and fishing tournamentsWikipedia adds that merchandising consultants ACNielsen state that between blockage September 2001 and August 2002 , tobacco companies advertising in the UK spent GBP25 million , excluding sponsorship and indirect advertising , disquieted down as followsGBP11 million on press advertisingGBP13 .

2 million on billboardsGBP714 ,550 on radio advertisingGBP106 ,253 on direct mail advertisingAction on Smoking and Health , a public health advocator in the United Kingdom , summarizes how tobacco advertising increases enjoyment in its Web si teBy supporting(a) children or three-year-old adults to experiment with tobacco and thereby slip into regular useBy encouraging smokers to increase consumptionBy reducing smokers pauperization to quitBy encouraging former smokers to resumeBy reject full and open backchat of the hazards of smoking as a result of media dependence on advertising revenuesBy muting opposition to controls on tobacco as a result of the dependence of organisations receiving sponsorship from tobacco companies By creating through the ubiquitousness of advertising , sponsorship , etc . an environment in which tobacco use is seen as familiar and acceptable and the warnings slightly its health are underminedLoyalty by means of the Post OfficeLewis , Slade and Delnevo writes that the tobacco marketing has shifted from a focus on traditional advertising to change magnitude use of techniques express developing and maintaining relationships with individual...If you want to get a full essay, revisal it on our website: ! OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper