Racial Profiling by the Police Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Racial Profiling by the Police - Research Paper ExampleEveryone must make up experienced profiling at least once in his/her life, but primarily persons are targeted. much(prenominal) profiling is exercised by nation in authority including school administrators, security personnel, criminal justice and constabulary en military posturement agencies. Police profiling is a type of racism carried out by the law of nature officials against the offender. It has been seen that this problem has been popular in even the most developed parts of the populace and it becomes the main reason of discrimination against the civilians. The police part is considered to be one of the most influential departments in all the countries and, hence, racial profiling by this department can lead to many problems within the infrastructure of the country. Recently, the congressman Keith Ellison picked a fight against the department by voicing his concerns for the Muslim Americans. Ellison stated Racial st ereotyping is simply not good policing.. It threatens the values Americans ascertain dear. He argued that he himself was a target of this discrimination and wanted the relevant authorities to civilise into notice the current problem going inside one of the most developed countries in the world (as cited in Diaz 2012). Racial profiling threatens our fundamental principles. Racial profiling by law enforcement agencies and the associated prosecution of people of colored skin is one much(prenominal) example. It targets people on artificial basis of color on matters of law enforcement, causing hindrances in policing efforts and making law enforcement agencies lose their credibility within the community which they cook vowed to protect and serve. The police force is looked up to maintain fairness and justice in a troupe the disgraceful exercise of racial profiling has caused people to fear the system. This unjust practice remains stigma on democratic nations and an insult to the cla ims of racial equality. It is, however, imperative that the origins of racial profiling by the police force and criminal investigators are highlighted. In the 1950s, a high-profile officer at the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Howard Teten, introduced and popularized the mere touch sensation of racial profiling by analyzing the attributes and traits of the criminal, his past records and the situation at the crime scene. This practice of profiling, even though stereotypical in nature, spilled over to the police force with time. Since September 11, 2001, racial profiling has grown and the Obama brass instrument and FBI guidelines have been codified by these practices such as the dishonorable treatment of Muslims and Arabs as suspects, denying them equality of ingenuousness and protection under law. What has been more disturbing is the federal governments backing of record searches of immigrants, such as Latino and Mexican communities, by the local law enforcement agencies. Because any legal cure for racial discrimination by law enforcement presently necessitates specific evidence of committed to discriminate, it is exceedingly problematic, if not impossible, for whiz sufferers to voice